Jul 11,2019
2,096 views
end-flag
  • Comments(2)
  • Likes(6)
Upload photo
You can only upload 5 files in total. Each file cannot exceed 2MB. Supports JPG, JPEG, GIF, PNG, BMP
0 / 10000
  • Hi there, not bad, but in the next version: - prefer thermal connections instead of direct connecting the pads at the copper pour. It's much easier to solder the components (e.g. big caps). - use wider power traces, it costs nothing.... - use bigger pads for the output terminals - make a larger distance bw. traces and mounting holes (rings) - do not forget the protection diodes! - what about heatsink???

    Jan Kotarski 2019-08-17 19:53:02Reply

    Hello, thanks for the feedback! -I got used to designing the boards without thermal isolation. I know that it's easier to solder but I prefer it this way. -the transformer of this size can supply no more than 100mA per side, so traces this wide and no heatsink is OK in this case. -The mounting holes are big enough to accomodate usual M3 screw with a lot of clearance, but you are probably right, I could increase the distance easily.

    Reply
VOTING 1 votes
  • 1 USER VOTES
10.00
  • YOUR VOTE 0.00 0.00
DE ZARDO
Engineer
  • 10
    design
  • 10
    usability
  • 10
    creativity
  • 10
    content
10.00
You may also like